Homeopathy is an alternative medicine practice that has been shown not to work. Any affects of homeopathy are no better than a placebo.

Homeopathy is a system of alternative medicine developed in the late 18th century by Samuel Hahnemann, based on the idea of “like cures like”—that a substance causing symptoms in a healthy person can, in extremely diluted form, treat similar symptoms in a sick person. Remedies are made through a process of serial dilution and succussion (vigorous shaking), often to the point where no molecules of the original substance remain. Supporters argue that the water retains a “memory” of the substance and that this somehow triggers the body’s natural healing processes.

However, from a scientific standpoint, homeopathy lacks credible evidence for efficacy beyond the placebo effect. Numerous large-scale, high-quality studies and systematic reviews have consistently found that homeopathic treatments are no more effective than placebos. The dilutions used are often so extreme—sometimes beyond Avogadro’s number—that they contain no active ingredient, which challenges basic principles of chemistry and pharmacology. The placebo effect, patient expectations, and the therapeutic context (such as the long consultations homeopaths often provide) are often responsible for perceived improvements.

That said, many people report personal benefits from homeopathy, and in some cultures or communities, it holds significant traditional or holistic value. These experiences are real to them, and in some cases, homeopathy might indirectly support health by encouraging lifestyle changes, reducing stress, or simply by making patients feel cared for. But it’s essential to distinguish between perceived efficacy and actual biological mechanisms of action, especially when treating serious conditions where delays in effective care could have consequences.

While homeopathy may offer comfort or symptom relief for some individuals through placebo or supportive interaction, there’s no robust scientific evidence supporting it as an effective treatment. If someone finds it helpful for mild, self-limiting conditions, that’s their choice—but it shouldn’t replace proven medical treatments, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. A balanced, informed approach is key: understanding its limits while respecting people’s autonomy and experiences.

Most Useful Resources:
Homeopathy (Foot Health Forum)
Homeopathy (Podiapaedia)
Homeopathy (Podiatry Arena)
Damning report on homeopathy (Podiatry Arena)
Do you need Homeopathy? (Miracle Cures)
Homeopathy Does Not Work (Soapbox Sunday)
The Myth of Homeopathy (CP)
Homeopathy for Foot Problems (Foot Health Friday)
Homeopathy (Podiatry Ninja)