Best Running Shoes

There is not really such thing as the best running shoes. Each runners has individual needs and individual response to running shoes, so there will be a best running shoe for each runner and it will not be the same running shoes.

{openx:185}

When choosing the best running shoe, the most important factor is understanding your foot type and gait. Everyone’s biomechanics are different—some runners overpronate (feet roll inward), some supinate (feet roll outward), while others have a more neutral stride. Many running stores offer gait analysis, either by watching your stride on a treadmill or analyzing your footprint, to help you figure this out. Knowing your gait will guide you toward stability shoes (for overpronation), neutral shoes (for balanced gait), or cushioned shoes (often better for supination). This ensures that the shoe supports your natural movement, reducing the risk of injury.

Another key consideration is the terrain you’ll be running on. Road running shoes are built lighter and smoother, designed for pavement and treadmill surfaces. Trail running shoes, on the other hand, have deeper lugs and stronger traction to handle dirt, rocks, and uneven paths, with added protection for your feet. If you plan to mix both environments, a hybrid shoe might be a good compromise. Picking the right shoe for your terrain will not only make your runs more comfortable but also extend the life of your shoes since they’ll be suited to the surfaces you’re training on.

Comfort should always be at the top of your list when selecting a running shoe. Look for a fit that leaves about a thumb’s width of space in front of your longest toe and a snug, but not tight, feel around the midfoot and heel. The upper material should feel breathable and flexible, moving naturally with your foot. Trying on shoes later in the day, when your feet are slightly swollen, gives you a better sense of how they’ll feel during a run. Don’t be tempted by trends or looks alone—a shoe that feels natural and supportive is far more important than style.

Lastly, consider cushioning and durability based on your running goals. If you’re training for long distances, a shoe with more cushioning can help absorb impact and reduce fatigue. For speed workouts or races, lightweight and responsive shoes may give you the edge. Pay attention to the shoe’s expected mileage—most running shoes last around 300–500 miles before losing their supportive structure. Rotating between two pairs can help extend their life and keep your body adapting. By matching your shoe choice with your running style, terrain, and goals, you’ll maximize comfort, performance, and injury prevention.

Most Useful Resources:
Best Running Shoes (PodiaPaedia)
Best Running Shoes (Foot Health Forum)
The ‘Best Running Shoe’? (Podiatry Ninja)
The Best Running Shoe (The Best Running Shoe Blog)

{openx:185}

Arthur Lydiard

Arthur Lydiard who was a well known running coach, coaching athlete to many world records and Olympic gold medals. He was the originator of the 100 miles a week training regime.

{openx:185}

Arthur Lydiard was a New Zealand running coach widely regarded as one of the most influential figures in the history of distance running. Born in 1917, he initially started as a recreational runner before discovering his passion for coaching. His innovative training methods helped transform running from a sport dominated by natural talent into one where structured training could systematically develop world-class athletes. Lydiard’s approach reshaped modern endurance training and laid the foundation for countless programs still used today.

At the heart of Lydiard’s philosophy was his emphasis on building a strong aerobic base. He famously advocated for high-mileage training, recommending runners complete around 100 miles per week at a steady pace. This aerobic conditioning, he argued, was the essential groundwork for later phases of training, including strength, speed, and racing-specific workouts. By organizing training into distinct phases, his system ensured athletes peaked at the right time for major competitions, a principle now known as periodization.

Lydiard’s methods produced remarkable results. Under his guidance, New Zealand athletes like Peter Snell, Murray Halberg, and Barry Magee became Olympic champions and world record holders in the 1960s. What made his success even more notable was the range of athletes he coached—Snell, for example, excelled at middle-distance events (800m and 1500m), while Magee was a marathoner. This versatility demonstrated the adaptability and effectiveness of his training system across different distances.

Beyond his athletes’ accomplishments, Arthur Lydiard’s influence spread globally. His ideas inspired coaches and runners around the world, and many modern training programs still reflect his principles. He traveled extensively, lecturing and advising national teams in countries such as Finland, Mexico, and Japan. His legacy is not just in the medals won by his athletes, but in the enduring framework he provided for distance running, one that continues to shape the sport more than half a century later.

Most Useful Resources:
Arthur Lydiard (Running Heroes)
Arthur Lydiard (PodiaPaedia)

{openx:185}

Asics Running Shoes

Asics Running Shoes
ASICS is an an acronym that is derived from the Latin phrase, Anima Sana In Corpore Sano which translates to a sound mind in a sound body. They are the most popular running shoes on the market.

{openx:185}

ASICS running shoes are widely recognized for their focus on biomechanics, cushioning, and injury prevention. The brand originated in Japan in 1949 and has since become one of the most trusted names in performance footwear. Their shoes are designed with a science-driven approach, often incorporating input from athletes and researchers. A key philosophy behind ASICS is promoting natural running mechanics while providing enough support and shock absorption to reduce stress on the joints. This balance makes them popular among both casual joggers and elite marathon runners.

One of the most notable technologies in ASICS running shoes is the GEL cushioning system, which has been a cornerstone of their designs for decades. This system uses silicone-based gel strategically placed in the midsole to absorb impact forces during heel strike and toe-off phases of running. Many models also feature FlyteFoam, a lightweight midsole foam that offers both responsiveness and durability. Combined, these technologies create a cushioned yet stable platform that adapts to different running styles and terrains, from road running to trail adventures.

ASICS offers a wide range of shoe categories tailored to different needs. For example, the Kayano series is built for stability and overpronators, while the Nimbus line is geared toward neutral runners seeking maximum cushioning. Runners who prefer speed and responsiveness often choose the Metaspeed or DS Trainer models, which are lighter and designed for racing. Trail runners can look to the Trabuco series, which emphasizes traction and durability on uneven surfaces. This variety allows runners to select shoes based on gait, arch type, and intended use, ensuring a more personalized fit.

Beyond performance, ASICS places emphasis on comfort and injury prevention, making them a go-to choice for people who spend long hours on their feet. Many users highlight the supportive fit, breathable mesh uppers, and durable outsole designs that extend the shoe’s lifespan. In recent years, ASICS has also invested in sustainable practices, introducing eco-friendly materials in some models without compromising performance. Altogether, ASICS running shoes stand out as a blend of innovation, comfort, and reliability, making them a consistent favorite in the global running community.

Most Useful Resources:
Asics Running Shoes (Podiatry Arena)
Asics (PodiaPaedia)
Asics Running Shoes (Foot Health Forum)
{openx:185}

Enko Running Shoes

Enko Running Shoes

The Enko Running Shoes are a new entry into the running shoe market that have cantilevered spring in the rearfoot. The ‘hardness’ of the spring is based on the body weight of the runner. They are no longer available.

{openx:185}

The Enko Running Shoes stand out in the athletic footwear market because of their unique mechanical cushioning system. Unlike traditional running shoes that rely on foam midsoles, Enko integrates a spring-based mechanism in the sole. This system compresses and releases energy with each stride, aiming to reduce impact on the joints while improving energy return. The result is a running experience that feels both cushioned and propulsive, appealing particularly to runners who want better protection against repetitive stress injuries.

Another defining feature of Enko shoes is their adjustability. Runners can fine-tune the springs according to their weight and running style, which is rare in mainstream footwear. This customization allows the shoe to adapt more precisely to the individual, offering a tailored feel that could enhance both comfort and performance. The design also features a durable build, with replaceable springs that extend the shoe’s lifespan beyond the average running shoe, making them a long-term investment rather than a short-term purchase.

From a design perspective, Enko shoes look quite different from conventional running shoes. The exposed spring mechanism gives them a futuristic and mechanical appearance, which may divide opinions aesthetically. While some runners appreciate the innovation and bold look, others may prefer the sleeker profiles of brands like Nike or Adidas. However, the unconventional design is central to the shoe’s function, and those prioritizing performance over style often find the trade-off worthwhile.

In terms of use, Enko shoes are best suited for road running and long-distance training. The cushioning mechanism is particularly effective on hard surfaces, where joint impact tends to be the highest. Many users report reduced fatigue during extended runs, though the shoes are slightly heavier than minimalist alternatives. This means they may not be ideal for speed-focused workouts or racing, but for endurance and injury prevention, they can be a game-changer. Overall, the Enko Running Shoes are a fascinating innovation in sports footwear, blending engineering and ergonomics in a way few competitors attempt.

Most Useful Resources:
Enko Running Shoes (PodiaPaedia)
Another new ‘spring loaded’ running shoe – Enko (Podiatry Arena)
Enko (Foot Health Forum)
What happened to the Enko running shoes? (Podiatry FAQ)
Did Enko Running shoes go into liquidation? (iRunning)

{openx:185}

The Ampla Running Shoe

ampla running shoes

Ampla running shoes are designed with a cantilever under the forefoot, designed to encourage a forefoot strike when running as opposed to a heel strike.

{openx:185}

The Ampla running shoe is a performance-oriented footwear design created with the goal of improving running efficiency and reducing the risk of injury. Unlike traditional running shoes, the Ampla shoe incorporates a unique carbon fiber plate in the midsole that functions like a lever, helping to propel the runner forward with each stride. This design is intended to optimize ground contact and energy return, giving runners a sensation of smoother transitions and increased propulsion. It was marketed as a shoe for serious runners looking to enhance both speed and running economy.

A distinctive feature of the Ampla shoe is its segmented sole design, often divided into a forefoot platform and a responsive midfoot/heel component. This allows for controlled loading of the foot, encouraging proper running mechanics. For example, it promotes midfoot striking, which is believed to reduce impact forces compared to heel striking. The shoe’s structure was built not just for comfort but to actively influence gait patterns, guiding runners into more efficient stride cycles. This was a departure from the passive cushioning philosophy of many conventional running shoes.

In addition to performance benefits, the Ampla shoe sought to address common problems runners face, such as overstriding and poor energy utilization. The carbon fiber plate, working almost like a springboard, reduces wasted energy during push-off while maintaining stability. Athletes who tested the shoe often reported that it felt firm yet responsive, emphasizing efficiency rather than plush cushioning. Its design philosophy was rooted in biomechanics research, making it appealing to runners who valued science-driven innovation in footwear.

Despite its unique engineering, the Ampla running shoe remained relatively niche in the broader market. Its specialized design was not for everyone, as some runners found the firm ride less comfortable for long distances. However, it carved out a reputation as a forward-thinking performance shoe, influencing later innovations in carbon-plated running footwear. In hindsight, the Ampla can be seen as an early precursor to the carbon fiber “super shoes” that dominate today’s racing scene, bridging the gap between traditional running footwear and the new era of high-tech performance shoes.

Most Useful Resources:
Ampla (PodiaPaedia)
New ‘innovative’ running shoe from Ampla (Foot Health Forum)
New ‘innovative’ running shoe from Ampla (Podiatry Arena)
New ‘innovative’ running shoe from Ampla (iPodiatry)

{openx:185}

The Airia Running Shoe

The Airia one running shoes are a different type of running shoe in that they are zero drop and have a lateral slant (forefoot valgus wedge) under the forefoot. This will have different biomehcanical affects in different runners. The company that makes them claims that you can get a performance advantage using the shoe.

{openx:185}

The Airia One is a pretty unusual running shoe that was designed with a strong biomechanical twist. It was developed by a Swedish company (Airia Running) with the goal of enhancing running efficiency and speed. Their marketing claims were bold: something like “8 out of 10 runners see a performance gain between 1-7% when using them.”

Key design features include:

  • An asymmetric sole geometry, meaning the midsole is thicker under the lateral (outer) forefoot compared to the medial side. There’s a transverse drop (rather than only a longitudinal heel-to-toe drop).
  • A pronounced toe spring (the toe portion curves upward), and a rounded heel. The idea was to promote a more efficient toe-off and reduce ground contact time.
  • Lightweight materials: thin, breathable mesh uppers; Vibram rubber outsole; OrthoLite insoles.

What Users Found Good / Challenging

What people liked:

  • Once runners got used to them (after a few miles), many report a very natural, “rolling” running feel. The toe-off is often praised.
  • For shorter, faster runs (intervals, tempo runs) or for people who already run with a midfoot or forefoot strike, the Airia One could feel quite exciting: light, responsive, and pushing runners to engage different muscles in different ways.

Challenges & criticisms:

  • The design takes a lot of getting used to. Many users felt awkward at first, especially because the sole geometry forces different foot behaviour (e.g. landing and toe-off) than what many are used to.
  • Some discomfort was reported, especially around toes or the balls of the feet. The toe spring can cause pressure or rubbing.
  • Because of the firm ride and unusual sole, long runs could be tough; for many, the shoe was better suited to shorter distance performance work rather than full-marathon pacing.

Where it Stands / Legacy

  • As of now, Airia One is no longer available (production has ceased).
  • Despite that, it has made waves in the running community as a kind of “experimental” or “cult” shoe: one that pushes boundaries in how a running shoe can influence biomechanics rather than just cushioning or support.
  • Its biggest legacy might not be in how many people used them daily, but in how it sparked discussions about sole geometry, foot strike patterns, and what “running efficiency” really means. For runners curious about something outside the norm, the Airia One remains a reference point.

Most Useful Resources:
Airia (PodiaPaedia)
New “Biomechanically Perfect” Shoe (Foot Health Forum)
Airia Running shoes: the new “Biomechanically Perfect” Shoe (Podiatry Arena)
The new ‘biomechanically perfect’ running shoe from Airia? (Running Research Junkie)
Another look at the performance claims by the Airia One running shoe; a theoretical context (Running Research Junkie)
Airia Running Shoes (Podiatry TV)
AIRIA ONE : cette chaussure fait-elle vraiment courir plus vite ? (Runners.fr)

{openx:185}

Adidas Running Shoes

The Adidas running shoes have been around since the beginning of the running shoes being more widely used. they are innovators and leaders in the market.

{openx:185}

Most Useful Resources:
Adidas (PodiaPaedia)
Adidas Springblade running shoe (Podiatry Arena)
Adidas Running Shoes (Podiatry TV)
Adidas Boost Technology (Running Research Junkie)
Adidas (Foot Health Forum)

{openx:185}

Abebe Bikila – the Barefoot Marathoner

Abebe Bikila won the 1960 Rome Olympic marathon running barefoot. He is often held up as a poster boy by the barefoot running community. He went on to win the 1964 Toyko Olympic marathon in world record time, this time wearing shoes.

{openx:185}

Abebe Bikila, the legendary Ethiopian marathon runner, etched his name into history when he won the 1960 Rome Olympic marathon running completely barefoot. Competing without shoes was not a symbolic choice at first—he had trained extensively barefoot and found it natural, but it also highlighted his extraordinary resilience and discipline. His victory was especially significant because he became the first Black African athlete to win Olympic gold, inspiring a new generation of African distance runners who would go on to dominate the sport.

What made Bikila’s triumph so remarkable was not only the barefoot feat itself but also the manner of his victory. He ran through the cobblestoned streets of Rome, finishing with a time of 2:15:16, a new world record at the time. His calm, upright stride and steady pace symbolized strength and endurance, and his success challenged Western assumptions about who could excel on the world stage in long-distance athletics. Bikila’s performance brought international attention to Ethiopia and put African runners at the forefront of distance running.

Four years later, at the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, Bikila proved his dominance again—this time wearing shoes—by winning gold once more, despite recovering from an appendectomy just weeks before. This back-to-back Olympic victory cemented his reputation as one of the greatest marathoners of all time. Tragically, a car accident in 1969 left him paralyzed from the waist down, but even then he showed immense courage, competing in disabled sporting events before his untimely death in 1973. Abebe Bikila’s legacy continues to inspire, not just for his barefoot marathon, but for his unbreakable spirit.

Most Useful Resources:
Abebe Bikila (Podiatry FAQ’s)
Abebe Bikila (Running Hero’s)
10 September 1960 (Today in History)
Abebe Bikila as a poster boy (Podiatry Ninja)

{openx:185}

Foot Strike Pattern and Injury Rates in Runners

There is a lot of debate online about which is the best running technique for a runner to use. One of the more common debates is about the foot strike pattern and if it should be forefoot, midfoot or heel striking the ground first. The bulk of the evidence does not support one over the other.

{openx:185}

The foot strike pattern refers to the way a runner’s foot makes initial contact with the ground during each stride. There are three primary types: rearfoot strike (heel strike), midfoot strike, and forefoot strike. In rearfoot striking, the heel touches the ground first, followed by the midfoot and forefoot. Midfoot striking involves the heel and ball of the foot landing almost simultaneously, while forefoot striking means the ball of the foot contacts first, with the heel either lightly touching afterward or not at all. These patterns can influence biomechanics, efficiency, and risk of injury.

Most recreational runners naturally adopt a rearfoot strike, especially at slower paces. This pattern provides more stability and often feels comfortable because cushioned running shoes are designed to accommodate it. However, heel striking also increases impact forces transmitted up the leg, which has been associated with certain injuries like shin splints or knee pain. On the other hand, elite distance runners tend to show more variety, with some preferring midfoot or forefoot strikes, particularly at faster speeds.

A midfoot strike is often considered a balance between cushioning and efficiency. It tends to reduce the braking forces that occur with a heavy heel strike while avoiding the high calf and Achilles loading associated with forefoot striking. Many coaches recommend midfoot striking for long-distance running because it spreads out impact forces more evenly across the foot. However, adopting this pattern requires adequate ankle and calf strength, and a gradual transition to avoid overuse injuries.

The forefoot strike is commonly seen in sprinters and barefoot runners. This style allows for faster turnover and efficient energy return from the Achilles tendon, which acts like a spring. It’s beneficial for short, explosive efforts but places significant stress on the calves, Achilles tendon, and metatarsals. Without careful adaptation, runners switching suddenly to a forefoot strike can experience calf strain or plantar fascia issues. Ultimately, no single pattern is “best” for all runners—individual biomechanics, goals, and comfort largely determine the most suitable strike pattern.

Most Useful Resources:
Foot Strike Pattern and Running Injury (PodiaPaedia)
Foot Strike Pattern and Injury Rates (Running Research Junkie)
Its six of one and half a dozen of the other: Rearfoot vs Forefoot striking when running (Running Research Junkie)
Emerging Evidence on Footstrike Patterns in Running (Podiatry Arena)
Running Footstrike: Rearfoot, Midfoot or Forefoot, Which is Best? (Podiatry Arena)
New studies on injury rates between forefoot and rearfoot striking (Podiatry Arena)

{openx:185}